منابع مشابه
Sassi: a Reply to the Critique of Feldstein & Miller (2007)
The journal publishes both invited and unsolicited letters. It is at the editor's discretion whether such letters are sent out throught peer review In their review of the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI), Feldstein & Miller use incorrect methods to calculate accuracy and make unsubstantiated claims of bias in the SASSI test classifications [1]. The authors reviewed 36 studies,...
متن کاملDiagnosing truth , interactive sincerity , and depictive sincerity ∗
This paper presents two experimental findings pertaining to the semantics and pragmatics of superlative modifiers (at least, at most). First, in a scenario with N objects of a given type, speakers consistently judge it true that there are ‘at least N’ and ‘at most N’ objects of that type. This supports the debated position that the ignorance conveyed by superlative modifiers is an implicature, ...
متن کاملOn Ethnographic Sincerity
This essay posits sincerity and humor as linked ways of politicizing the interactions that underpin all ethnographic encounters. This politicization is contrasted with conventional anthropological preoccupations with authenticity (and fetishizations of ethnographic writing), and it demands attention to the human bodies that constitute ethnographic intersubjectivity. Combining a discussion of Ha...
متن کاملReply to Miller: Misunderstanding and mix-up of acoustic and optical communications.
In a Letter in PNAS, Miller (1) comments on our work on high-speed acoustic communication (2) by stating “using optical angular momentum (OAM) beams.” This clearly is a misunderstanding by the author: we did not use optical angular momentum; rather, we use the acoustic wave modulation. The author also misunderstands the OAM as “optical angular momentum,” while we clearly state in the manuscript...
متن کاملCultural psychology, A new look: reply to Bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and Miller (2002).
M. H. Bond (2002), A. P. Fiske (2002), S. Kitayama (2002), and J. G. Miller (2002) joined D. Oyserman, H. M. Coon, and M. Kemmelmeier (2002) in highlighting limitations of the individualism-collectivism model of culture. Concern is warranted; nevertheless, individualism-collectivism helps structure discourse on the influence of culture on the mind. To avoid level-of-analysis entanglements, Oyse...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Public Choice
سال: 2010
ISSN: 0048-5829,1573-7101
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-010-9703-9